Difference between revisions of "Course schedule"
From Research management course
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | This course introduces | + | This course introduces the technologies of scientific research. It teaches students how to present their results in the anticipated format. It results in a research paper that should be submitted to a reputable peer-reviewed journal. |
==Goals== | ==Goals== |
Revision as of 04:12, 7 October 2022
This course introduces the technologies of scientific research. It teaches students how to present their results in the anticipated format. It results in a research paper that should be submitted to a reputable peer-reviewed journal.
Goals
- General: to learn how to convey the author's message to the reader in a clear way.
- Practical: to publish a scientific paper, to be welcome in the research society.
Delivery
- Research paper in a peer-reviewed scientific journal
- Computational experiment with analysis and code to reproduce it
- Slides with a brief comprehensive results
- Video of the presentation speech
Schedule 2023
Date | N | To be done | Result to discuss | Symbol | |
February | 9 | 1 | Introduction and subscription. | List of participants. | Subscribed to the schedule |
16 | 2 | Select your project and tell about it. List references, write Abstract, LinkReview. | Abstract, Introduction, References in bib-file. | Abstract, LinkReview, B*egin-talk | |
23 | 3 | State your problem, generally in Introduction, and formally | Write the problem statement, write the basic algorithm description. | Introduction with References, Problem statement | |
March | 4 | 4 | Set goals and plan report of your computational experiment. Run basic code. Write down results. | Goals of the experiment. Basic code, draft report on the basic algorithm. Ready to the first checkpoint. | eXperiment palning, Basic code, Report, cHeck-1 |
9 | 5 | Run your computational experiment and visualise its results. | Code, visual presentation of results. Create a draft of your presentation for 1'30". | Code, Visualization, O*ne slide-talk | |
16 | 6 | Describe the algorithm. | The theory and algorithms are in the paper. | Theory | |
23 | 7 | Make the error and quality analysis. Finalise the computational experiment. | The experiment description with error analysis. | Error | |
April | 2 | 8 | Prepare for the reader the theoretical part and computational experiment. Explain the figures, write conclusions. Ready to the second checkpoint. | The paper draft with the sections Computational experiment and Conclusions. Checkpoint. | Document, cHeck-2, M*edium-talk |
9 | 9 | Your paper is ready to the peer-review. | You published your peer-review of your colleague's paper. | RevieW | |
16 | 10 | Finalization. Collect all necessary documents: author's affiliations, revew, response, English abstract, references for catalogs, and letter to the editor. | The paper and slides are subjects to submit. | Journal, Slide-check | |
23 | 11 | Prepare your presentation. | Presentation day. | Final show |
Consultations
- The workflow goes around each week, namely, week 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
- The iterative consultations and delivery of results are highly welcome! Start during the weekends.
- Deadline of the last version is: Wednesday 6:00am. The review goes on Wednesday working day.
- Each symbol A gives +1 according the system (А-, А, А+). No symbol gives A0.
Workload
- Student's workload depends on the group and can vary from 54 hours and up.
- A consultant is expected to make one-hour meeting weekly and promptly to student's questions. So it makes 12 to 16 hours.
- An expert is expected to state the problem and evaluate the delivery. It takes one hour maximum. And we guess any researcher is ready to discuss the favourite problem. In fact, it makes the negative workload: for a problem the expert solves as a daily routine some delivery appears after several months of synchronized work. The quality of the stated problem matters.
Past years
- Playlist 2022
- Playlist 2021
- Playlist 2020, 2019 link hidden
- Tests, link hidden