Difference between revisions of "Course schedule"

From Research management course
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
# Video of the presentation speech  
 
# Video of the presentation speech  
  
==Schedule 2022==
+
==Schedule 2023==
 
{|class="wikitable"         
 
{|class="wikitable"         
 
|-
 
|-
Line 21: Line 21:
 
|-   
 
|-   
 
|February
 
|February
|10
+
|9
 
|1
 
|1
 
|[[Week 1|Introduction and subscription.]]
 
|[[Week 1|Introduction and subscription.]]
Line 28: Line 28:
 
|-   
 
|-   
 
<!--|
 
<!--|
|17
+
|16
 
|1
 
|1
 
|[[Week 1|Set the workflow, schedule, tools.]]
 
|[[Week 1|Set the workflow, schedule, tools.]]
Line 36: Line 36:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|17
+
|16
 
|2
 
|2
 
|[[Week 2|Select your project and tell about it.]] List references, write Abstract, LinkReview.  
 
|[[Week 2|Select your project and tell about it.]] List references, write Abstract, LinkReview.  
Line 43: Line 43:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|24
+
|23
 
|3
 
|3
 
|[[Week 3|State your problem]],  generally in Introduction, and formally  
 
|[[Week 3|State your problem]],  generally in Introduction, and formally  
Line 50: Line 50:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|March
 
|March
|3
+
|4
 
|4
 
|4
 
|Set goals and [[Week 4|plan report of your computational experiment]]. <!-- write a description of your basic algorithm, prepare your computational experiment. -->Run basic code. Write down results.  
 
|Set goals and [[Week 4|plan report of your computational experiment]]. <!-- write a description of your basic algorithm, prepare your computational experiment. -->Run basic code. Write down results.  
Line 57: Line 57:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|8
+
|9
 
|5
 
|5
 
|Run your computational experiment and [[Week 5|visualise its results]].
 
|Run your computational experiment and [[Week 5|visualise its results]].
Line 64: Line 64:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|24
+
|16
 
|6
 
|6
 
|[[Week 6|Describe the algorithm]].
 
|[[Week 6|Describe the algorithm]].
Line 71: Line 71:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|31
+
|23
 
|7
 
|7
 
|Make the [[Week 7|error and quality analysis]]. Finalise the computational experiment.
 
|Make the [[Week 7|error and quality analysis]]. Finalise the computational experiment.
Line 78: Line 78:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|April
 
|April
|7
+
|2
 
|8
 
|8
 
|Prepare for the reader the theoretical part and computational experiment. Explain the figures, write conclusions. [[Week 8|Ready to the second checkpoint]].
 
|Prepare for the reader the theoretical part and computational experiment. Explain the figures, write conclusions. [[Week 8|Ready to the second checkpoint]].
Line 85: Line 85:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|14
+
|9
 
|9
 
|9
 
|Your paper is ready to [[Week 9|the peer-review]].  
 
|Your paper is ready to [[Week 9|the peer-review]].  
Line 92: Line 92:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|21
+
|16
 
|10
 
|10
 
|Finalization. Collect all necessary documents: author's affiliations, revew, response, [[Week 10|English abstract]], references for catalogs, and letter to the editor.
 
|Finalization. Collect all necessary documents: author's affiliations, revew, response, [[Week 10|English abstract]], references for catalogs, and letter to the editor.
Line 99: Line 99:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|28
+
|23
 
|11
 
|11
 
|[[Week 11|Prepare your presentation]].
 
|[[Week 11|Prepare your presentation]].

Revision as of 03:55, 7 October 2022

This course introduces to the technologies of scientific research, to teach the students to present the results of their studies in the format that is acknowledged by other researchers from the field of Machine Learning and Data Analysis. The expected result of the course is a research paper, submitted to a peer-reviewed journal from the list of the Higher Attestation Commission.

Goals

  • General: to learn how to convey the author's message to the reader in a clear way.
  • Practical: to publish a scientific paper, to be welcome in the research society.

Delivery

  1. Research paper in a peer-reviewed scientific journal
  2. Computational experiment with analysis and code to reproduce it
  3. Slides with a brief comprehensive results
  4. Video of the presentation speech

Schedule 2023

Date N To be done Result to discuss Symbol
February 9 1 Introduction and subscription. List of participants. Subscribed to the schedule
16 2 Select your project and tell about it. List references, write Abstract, LinkReview. Abstract, Introduction, References in bib-file. Abstract, LinkReview, B*egin-talk
23 3 State your problem, generally in Introduction, and formally Write the problem statement, write the basic algorithm description. Introduction with References, Problem statement
March 4 4 Set goals and plan report of your computational experiment. Run basic code. Write down results. Goals of the experiment. Basic code, draft report on the basic algorithm. Ready to the first checkpoint. eXperiment palning, Basic code, Report, cHeck-1
9 5 Run your computational experiment and visualise its results. Code, visual presentation of results. Create a draft of your presentation for 1'30". Code, Visualization, O*ne slide-talk
16 6 Describe the algorithm. The theory and algorithms are in the paper. Theory
23 7 Make the error and quality analysis. Finalise the computational experiment. The experiment description with error analysis. Error
April 2 8 Prepare for the reader the theoretical part and computational experiment. Explain the figures, write conclusions. Ready to the second checkpoint. The paper draft with the sections Computational experiment and Conclusions. Checkpoint. Document, cHeck-2, M*edium-talk
9 9 Your paper is ready to the peer-review. You published your peer-review of your colleague's paper. RevieW
16 10 Finalization. Collect all necessary documents: author's affiliations, revew, response, English abstract, references for catalogs, and letter to the editor. The paper and slides are subjects to submit. Journal, Slide-check
23 11 Prepare your presentation. Presentation day. Final show

Consultations

  1. The workflow goes around each week, namely, week 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
  2. The iterative consultations and delivery of results are highly welcome! Start during the weekends.
  3. Deadline of the last version is: Wednesday 6:00am. The review goes on Wednesday working day.
  4. Each symbol A gives +1 according the system (А-, А, А+). No symbol gives A0.

Workload

  1. Student's workload depends on the group and can vary from 54 hours and up.
  2. A consultant is expected to make one-hour meeting weekly and promptly to student's questions. So it makes 12 to 16 hours.
  3. An expert is expected to state the problem and evaluate the delivery. It takes one hour maximum. And we guess any researcher is ready to discuss the favourite problem. In fact, it makes the negative workload: for a problem the expert solves as a daily routine some delivery appears after several months of synchronized work. The quality of the stated problem matters.

Past years